Comments on: 20 Dubious Statements by Questionable Occultists https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/ Daniel James Hanley's Creations For Gaming. Home of the Ghastly Affair RPG. Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:53:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Daniel James Hanley https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5399 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:35:50 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5399 In reply to William Rutter.

Thanks! If one takes old grimoires at face value, Lucifer was apparently so busy being bossed around by magicians that he mustn’t have had time to actually do anything evil! And of course, the instructions for summoning the Devil were filled with easily broken conditions, so there was always an excuse when Satan didn’t actually appear to fetch your slippers.

]]>
By: Daniel James Hanley https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5398 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:27:53 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5398 In reply to sunlessnick.

Thanks! Regarding #19, the “danger” that naive young men would be seduced by predatory older widows was apparently a concern in Georgian/Regency England. But then the virtual hunting of young widows for their inheritances was also very common. In contrast, Benjamin Franklin famously advised young men to take an older mistress. #3, of course, is a riff on Mesmer. #6 was partially inspired by the colorful life of Baroness Julie de Krudener, the socialite and novelist who became a wandering mystic (and advisor to Tsar Alexander I).

]]>
By: Daniel James Hanley https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5396 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:07:30 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5396 In reply to John Marron.

Thanks. I’ve long had a fascination with “occult rascal” characters. The type that may even have actual magical powers, but find it easier to pull cons than use those abilities.

]]>
By: sunlessnick https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5394 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 11:06:24 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5394 In reply to William Rutter.

It even has a get-out clause for when (if) it goes wrong, since once you’ve removed the heart, the monarch is dead and thus no longer reigning.

]]>
By: sunlessnick https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5393 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 11:05:13 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5393 In reply to sunlessnick.

And 3 and 6.

]]>
By: William Rutter https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5391 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 08:13:50 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5391 Very amusing, and I like 7 as a plot beginning.

]]>
By: sunlessnick https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5390 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 01:18:04 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5390 Fantastic! I think 19 and 20 are my favourites.

]]>
By: John Marron https://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/20-dubious-statements-by-questionable-occultists/#comment-5389 Thu, 01 Jun 2017 19:46:40 +0000 http://engineoforacles.wordpress.com/?p=1530#comment-5389 Briiliant!

]]>